Laravel Breeze vs Jetstream: Performance, Pros/Cons, and When to Use Each

Laravel ships two official authentication starter kits: Breeze and Jetstream. Both handle login, registration, and password resets, but they diverge sharply in scope, architecture, and the assumptions they make about your application. Picking the wrong one either leaves you rebuilding features Jetstream gives you for free, or fighting Jetstream’s abstractions when all you needed was a login form.

This post breaks down the real differences—architecture, performance, trade-offs—and gives clear guidance on when each one makes sense.

What They Actually Are

Laravel Breeze is a minimal auth scaffolding package. It publishes plain controllers directly into your app/Http/Controllers/Auth directory—login, registration, password reset, email verification, profile management. You own all the code. There’s no abstraction layer between you and the auth logic.

Laravel Jetstream is a full-featured application starter kit built on top of two additional packages: Fortify (authentication backend) and Sanctum (API token management). Beyond basic auth, it adds two-factor authentication, team/organization management, browser session tracking, API token scoping, and profile photo uploads.

The key architectural difference: Breeze publishes controllers you edit directly. Jetstream hides auth logic behind Fortify and exposes customization through an “Actions” pattern—PHP classes in app/Actions that you override to change behavior.

Performance Differences

The performance gap between Breeze and Jetstream is not dramatic in terms of raw request latency. The difference is about weight and overhead:

Aspect	Breeze	Jetstream
Dependencies	Tailwind, optional Inertia/Livewire	Fortify + Sanctum + Tailwind + Livewire or Inertia
Database migrations	users, password_resets	users, password_resets, teams, team_user, team_invitations, sessions
Middleware	Standard auth middleware	Additional middleware for 2FA checks, team permissions, session management
Service providers	None extra	Fortify + Jetstream service providers registered on every request
Frontend bundle size	Auth views only	Auth + team management UI + 2FA UI + API token UI + session management UI
Published code footprint	~10 controllers	Actions classes + Fortify config + Sanctum config + team policies

In practice, the extra service providers and middleware Jetstream registers add a small amount of overhead to every request cycle—even requests that have nothing to do with authentication or teams. For most applications this is imperceptible. But if you’re not using teams, 2FA, or API tokens, that overhead is pure waste.

Breeze adds almost nothing to Laravel’s default boot process. What you install is what you get.

Breeze: Pros and Cons

Pros

Full code ownership. Controllers are published directly into your application. No hidden abstractions, no “Actions” pattern to learn. You read the controller, you understand the flow.

Low learning curve. If you understand Laravel controllers and middleware, you understand Breeze. There’s nothing new to learn.

Frontend flexibility. Breeze supports Blade, Livewire, and Inertia with either Vue or React. Jetstream only supports Vue for its Inertia stack.

Minimal dependencies. No Fortify, no Sanctum, no additional service providers. Your dependency tree stays lean.

Great for learning. Because the auth code is plain Laravel, it’s an excellent way to understand how authentication actually works under the hood.

Cons

No 2FA. You’ll need to build or install two-factor authentication yourself.

No team management. Multi-tenant team/organization features don’t exist. Building this from scratch is significant work.

No API token management. No built-in way to issue or scope API tokens.

No session management UI. Users can’t see or revoke their active browser sessions.

You build everything beyond basics yourself. Every advanced auth feature is your responsibility.

Jetstream: Pros and Cons

Pros

Production-ready feature set. 2FA, teams, API tokens, session management, profile photos, and account deletion are all included and working from the first artisan serve.

Built on Fortify. The auth backend is battle-tested and follows Laravel conventions. You get access to all Fortify features now and in future releases.

Sanctum integration. API token management with granular permission scoping is built in. Useful for SPAs and mobile apps consuming your API.

Team management. Users can create teams, invite members, and assign roles. This is a non-trivial feature to build from scratch.

Profile photo management. File upload, storage, and display logic handled out of the box.

Cons

Steeper learning curve. The Actions pattern, Fortify abstraction, and Sanctum configuration all require time to understand.

Hidden auth logic. Authentication flow lives inside Fortify, not in controllers you can read in your app. Debugging requires digging into vendor code.

No React support. The Inertia stack only supports Vue. If your team works in React, Jetstream isn’t an option without significant modification.

Overkill for simple apps. Team tables, 2FA columns, and session tracking add complexity you may never use.

Customization friction. Modifying default behavior means overriding Actions and understanding how Fortify dispatches them. It’s well-designed, but it’s another abstraction to learn.

When to Use Breeze

Choose Breeze when your application needs authentication but doesn’t need the enterprise features Jetstream provides:

• Simple CRUD applications — Admin panels, content management systems, internal tools
• Blogs and content sites — User accounts for comments or subscriptions
• MVPs and prototypes — Get auth working fast without unused features
• React + Inertia projects — Breeze is the only official option supporting React
• Learning projects — Understanding Laravel auth fundamentals by reading real controllers
• Apps with custom auth requirements — When you need full control over the auth flow from the start
• Single-user or simple multi-user apps — No team hierarchy needed

When to Use Jetstream

Choose Jetstream when you’d otherwise spend significant effort building the features it already provides:

• SaaS platforms — Multi-tenant team workspaces with roles and invitations
• Compliance-sensitive applications — 2FA is a requirement, not a nice-to-have
• API-first applications — Token management with granular permission scoping
• Collaborative tools — Users creating teams, inviting members, managing access
• Apps requiring session security — Users need to view and revoke active sessions across devices
• Projects where Vue + Inertia (or Livewire) is the chosen stack — Jetstream’s frontend is well-integrated

The Decision Framework

Ask yourself three questions:

1. Do you need teams or organizations? If yes, Jetstream saves you weeks of work. Team management with invitations, roles, and permissions is substantial to build correctly.

2. Do you need 2FA? If it’s a hard requirement (compliance, financial data, healthcare), Jetstream has it ready. If it’s a nice-to-have, you can add it to Breeze later with packages like pragmarx/google2fa-laravel.

3. Do you want React? If yes, Breeze is your only official option. Jetstream’s Inertia stack is Vue-only.

If you answered “no” to all three, start with Breeze. You can always add complexity later, but you can’t easily remove Jetstream’s abstractions once they’re baked into your application.

Key Takeaways

• Breeze publishes controllers; Jetstream uses Fortify abstractions. This is the fundamental architectural difference and affects how you customize auth behavior.
• Performance difference is minimal. Jetstream adds service providers and middleware overhead, but it’s negligible for most apps. The real cost is complexity, not speed.
• Breeze supports React; Jetstream does not. If you’re building with React and Inertia, the decision is made for you.
• Jetstream’s value is in teams and 2FA. If you don’t need either, Jetstream’s additional complexity isn’t justified.
• Start with Breeze when in doubt. It’s easier to add features to a simple foundation than to strip them from a comprehensive one.
• Choose Jetstream for SaaS. If you’re building a multi-tenant application with team workspaces, Jetstream’s team management alone justifies the added complexity.

---

Based on Laravel 11.x starter kits. Check the official Laravel documentation for the latest changes.